Joe Rogan has shared his thoughts about Kamala Harris and the idea of her becoming president in 2024. On his podcast, Rogan questioned if it would be right for Harris to take over after not being part of the Democratic primaries.
This idea came up after President Joe Biden decided not to run for another term. Some say he stepped back because of his age and low approval from people. In June, Harris was chosen by her party to be the Democratic candidate even though she had not been running in the primaries.
Joe Rogan Questions Kamala Harris’ Hypothetical Path to the Presidency
Talking with guest Duncan Trussell on his podcast, Rogan said it might feel unfair for someone to skip the primary elections and still have a chance to become president. He shared, If she didn’t compete in the primaries, how can she be the choice for the party This made him wonder if the rules should be different.
“Even if you are sad that Trump won and you wish Kamala Harris had won, if she did win, it would be the first time that anybody won without winning a primary, and that’s kind of crazy,” Rogan said. ” It’s not a good precedent to set; it’s not good to let people weasel around the system we have in place. By having a vice president and then immediately appointing them as the Democratic candidate, that’s kind of illegal.”
Rogan’s concern was not just about Harris but about the whole process of choosing leaders. People trust elections to be open and fair. If someone is picked without going through the same steps as others, it might make people feel uneasy about how decisions are made.
“How about let me say this: that should be illegal. You should have to have a vote from the people to decide who their Democratic elected person is going to be to run for president. That’s the whole deal like maybe people didn’t vote for you when you were running for president which is a fact.” Rogan added.
The discussion highlights a larger issue about the transparency and fairness of the election process. Primaries are meant to allow party members to choose their leaders, and skipping that process might lead to questions about legitimacy. Even though Harris’ candidacy followed party rules, Rogan’s concerns show how such decisions can create uncertainty among voters.
The 2024 elections are over, but the debates surrounding them raise important questions for future campaigns. Ensuring transparency and fairness is crucial for maintaining trust in democratic systems. Leaders who emerge from clear, open competition are more likely to gain the confidence of voters.
Joe Rogan’s reflections remind us that the process matters as much as the outcome. As political landscapes continue to evolve, these discussions will shape how voters and leaders approach elections in the years to come.
For now, this is just something to think about, but it reminds everyone that fairness and trust are key when it comes to choosing leaders.
